It was supposed to be just a narrative

 It was supposed to be just a narrative

I was watching a video of these pseudo sociologists who never studied social sciences; for his accent and for his limited and childish vocabulary he was one of those functional illiterates who manage to invest sums to acquire paid views on social networks to appear very popular and claim to be influencers with many likes, therefore, one of these inconsequential video creators was making a mistake serious that no first-semester student of Anthropology would ever make the mistake of comparing cultures and disparaging them, except that journalists engaged in unilateral discourses of the war of position of social and political opinion very common in this era where the West is reproducing the Stalinist practices of sophisticated and profound censorship, those that at the time of the former USSR made people apathetic in the face of the closed psychic violation that they were capable of unconsciously self-censoring so as not to be denounced by their own children and spouses to the central committee of political re-education.

Then the amateur video commented in a tone of reproach that it was showing how much Saudi Arabian women are humiliated and massacred oppressed by the macho culture of Arab men, then it shows a group of four wives gathering in a square, see how they are dressed in a black clothing that covers them completely and leaves nothing of their bodies in sight except their eyes.

These women cannot show off their bodies, they stay at home without being able to work, and they cannot drive cars and take care of the house and children, they usually have many servants at home so that they live in idleness most of the time, taking care of their husbands.

Before this video I was watching another video about the night in London: naked women, very tight clothes, vacuum packed, legs, naked navel, high heels, lots of makeup, but always in groups of women and almost none of them accompanied by someone. male or in couples, so were the same identical images both in Miami, Houston in Texas at night, and changing the video I went to see nightlife scenes in Moscow and St. Petersburg, or in Riga in Latvia the same nature of image in Minski in Belarus, the women always dressed decently, in dresses or skirts, few women were found wearing long pants but when they did wear them they were wide pants and wide shorts, none wearing leggings or vacuum tight shorts.

What is happening to the West, compared to the other side of civilization?

My discovery is that it was a man who invented feminism. A speech to rid man of his heavy social, economic, moral and sexual responsibilities. Let's look at the speeches.

Suppose a person goes to live in your house, you being a man, this person says that he will stay in your house, and you go to work while he says that he will stay at home, enjoying life, and that you have to protect him , dress her, feed her, take care of her physical and spiritual health with care and affection, give her exclusive affection, and sex when she wants it, if that person is female, that's fine, but if it's another man, then this proposal becomes an offense.

Thus, those who invented feminism had a male mind, they were in favor of men, so the discourse was only changed to oppression, instead of exploitation of male work by female companions; while the social roles were accepted, with the male being the slave of the home to sustain the life of the princess or the queen of the home, then the coverage of the situation had a moralistic cover of machismo, oppression, it was oppression to keep the queen at home while the slave husband tried to support his prebend with domestic idleness disguised and disguised as male oppression, but on the contrary, it was just female privilege.

The discourse changed reality, if we go back to the video of the Arab women, other narratives can be constructed besides oppression: Arab women are surrounded by so much security that they do not expose their bodies to the greed and lust of other men, they receive court treatment from the best queens , with leisure, jewelry, private driver who is her husband, they don't work, they have fun with walks, free meals, clothes, jewelry, expensive lingerie, makeup and expensive beauty treatments that cost at least a hundred dollars a simple nail maintenance and hair, creams and make-up products and cosmetics are the most expensive, women's clothing is more varied than what is offered in the male market and the variety of shoes for women is much richer than that offered for the male market, there is practically no male cosmetics , there aren't nearly as many companies that specialize in cosmetic surgery and beauty care procedures as there are for women, so the world of health and beauty is all about women and women.

Where was for the discourse of male oppression? Certainly a very expert male gave checkmate to the lust and exploitative opulence of the feminine and overthrew the greatest privilege and the greatest exploitation of humanity which was machismo precisely by overthrowing all female privileges under the guise of male oppression, now it's up to the male discovering that male prostitution does not exist because the woman never had to pay to get what she has for free, which is sex and expenses paid by a sexist provider, but this the idiots are destroying with the exchanged speech, where the freed woman only leaves the male protection chauvinist and will take care of herself under the discourse of taking care of independently self-care for her autonomy and having to sweat, study, work to get what was free.

Marilena Chauí, from the PT defends female work as an emancipator for women that dignifies and guarantees equal rights; but male work is the oppression of the workforce where the capitalist extracts surplus value from his working time. Does that explain the paradox, or is it a contradiction?