Logical feminist explanations

 Logical feminist explanations

Feminists argue that the role of the female domestic woman is asymmetrical and exploitative on the part of males;

The feminist explanation of slave or housemaid work free of charge for the husband is very intelligent, because without her husband at home the woman would not need to be the husband's maid, because without her husband she would no longer need to: cook, wash, iron , clean, he could leave all that aside, dirty, he would no longer need to eat or take care of the house, as he no longer had a husband to work for him at home, that is logical, a very obvious explanation.

I know a divorced woman who got rid of all the household chores after her husband left, as it is well known that single people lead a very good life, especially women without a husband and without a partner, they don't need: stove, refrigerator, broom, buckets and squeegees and other slave domestic work tools.

Feminists argue that men have not let them study or work on equal terms in the labor market for millennia.

The feminist explanation about the privilege of male work is very intelligent, since since the Middle Ages men have always occupied the best jobs, such as: landlord, foreman, and vassal and feudal women were left with: weeding the pastures, with heavy carpentry , with heavy carpentry, they cut all the wood for the winter, shoed the horses while the men did not even carry stones or bricks to make the houses and castles, they watched and told the women to do the worst work of all, the most painful of all. all the household chores such as: cooking, washing dishes and pans, sewing and changing the children's clothes. If there were equality between the two sexes, women could be in the positions of: accountants, legislators, senators, mayors as all men always do, without exception, men never do jobs without social prestige, such as: garbage collectors, plumbers, drivers, porters, stevedores, fishermen, that's something for women in toxic macho society.

There will never be no shortage of arguments for those excluded from all over the world, the most idiotic ones, but because of the exceptions, it is impossible to explain how in the midst of slavery there was once in colonial slave-holding Brazil a black engineer who designed the Paranaguá railroad, or as in a racist and sexist country Maria Quitéria was a graduated officer of the Armed Forces of Colonial Brazil, it seems that people do not occupy the best positions because of prejudice, because competence does nothing for a black Machado de Assis to stand out as the patron of literature Brazilian in the middle of the Republic where not even the poor and women could vote and be voted, but the Queen of Brazil was Isabel born in the most sexist Empire in Europe, Portugal, and court where princesses were trained to just get pregnant, but this only confuses the minds that see everything as prejudice and never as a society that is of social and economic hierarchical social classes and that in virtue and p The human being is not perfect and efficient in the allocation of talents and human resources and the abilities that need to be discovered: either by public competition for the selection of abilities, or by indication, or by birth or luck.